tax

Tory rivals’ spending splurge is running out of control. But any Brexit - and especially no deal - means much less money in future.

Dyson, Lawson, Rees-Mogg… wealthy Brexiters (or their assets) are moving out of UK. Leaving ordinary folk to mop up their mess is shameful.

Both Brexiters appealed to EU law in recent legal battles. This undermines their arguments for leaving.

Corbyn wants green jobs and more investment. May wants to slash business taxes. But staying inside the EU would be best for jobs and prosperity.

May wants EU leaders to take united stand against Putin. Why wasn’t Brexit mentioned? Ditto when Today discussed new EU tax on tech giants.

Brexit will make it harder to work with EU partners on international tax avoidance, and leave UK weak against US corporate behemoths.

Not only could we respond to voters’ concerns about migration without damaging economy. Quitting EU would also involve some loss of control.

The French president didn’t mention Brexit but said he hoped Britain would ultimately find its place in a multi-speed Europe.

We do not “send” this sum, we are not going to “take control” of it, and we will have less money to spend, not more.

Voting to leave the European Union has reopened any number of questions we thought settled. We must choose wisely.

If only migrants who’ve lived here 5 years got tax-free personal allowance, fewer would come. We might not need to quit EU to do this.

Billion-pound figures quoted by Brexiteers are gross distortions - EU membership makes us better able to take on multinationals.