free movement

It’s bad for the economy, the young and the unity of the UK. It also means less control not more. It’s not too late to stop the madness.

One only has to look at what Belgium does to see that much tighter rules on migration are possible while staying in the EU.

Our PM and other EU leaders talk as if free movement is absolute. The language in the underlying treaties is much more nuanced.

Irony of choosing Davos to make first foreign defence of taking UK out of EU is that the Swiss are going in exactly opposite direction.

Confirming the reciprocal rights of UK and other EU citizens is well-intentioned. But it is hard to do and shows how complex Brexit is.

Telegraph said Angela Merkel may make concessions on free movement to Brexit Britain. In fact she said the exact opposite.

Would EU give us full single market access without free movement? Would we accept being a second-class state, following rules with no vote?

The proposed accord will not reduce immigration and could automatically enshrine EU rules in Swiss law. It’s cold comfort for Brexiteers.

It’s not just trade and investment. We must resolve a host of difficult issues about relations with the EU.

British citizens will have to apply and pay a fee to enter the Schengen zone, with ramifications for tourism and business.

What began as an exercise to empower the electorate could further concentrate power in the hands of the wealthiest.

Ireland and Denmark got to vote twice on EU treaties, but history offers scant encouragement to those hoping for a second referendum to keep UK in the EU.