Analysis

Is EU migration falling faster than even ministers want?

by Luke Lythgoe | 23.02.2017
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • +1
  • LinkedIn 0
  • Email

We shouldn’t read too much into one quarter’s migration figures. But UK will be damaged by an abrupt fall – even David Davis understands that.

The latest migration figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show net migration fell to 273,000 in the year ending September 2016 – the lowest 12-month period since the year to June 2014. This remains a far cry from Theresa May’s “tens of thousands” commitment. But if more EU citizens start quitting the UK – perhaps because they don’t feel welcome – our economy and vital public services such as the NHS and care for the elderly will be hit.

The ONS recorded a statistically significant increase in EU citizens leaving the UK between July and September last year, with 12,000 more departures than the previous quarter. This is one factor behind the overall decrease of 49,000 in net migration – although that total figure is not itself statistically significant. And even the EU picture is mixed, with immigration from Romania and Bulgaria jumping 19,000 to its highest peak ever.

The ONS warned “it is too early to say what effect the referendum result has had on long-term international migration”.

Still, it is notable how a number of government ministers were saying they wanted to keep the door open to at least some EU migrants even before these latest figures. Speaking to reporters in Tallinn, Estonia, this week Brexit minister David Davis suggested immigration of low-skilled Eastern European workers would continue for a long time yet.

“In the hospitality sector, hotels and restaurants, in the social-care sector, working in agriculture, it will take time – it will be years and years before we get British citizens to do those jobs.” He added: “Don’t expect just because we’re changing who makes the decision on the policy, the door will suddenly shut: it won’t.”

This didn’t please the hardest of Brexiters. Former minister Iain Duncan Smith told The Times he was surprised at the timescale, commenting: ““My sense is that it is going to happen quicker than that.”

But Davis’ comments fit well with a government  coming to terms with the reality of abrupt restrictions on migrants. In September, Communities Secretary Sajid Javid suggested EU construction workers could still come if that’s what it took to tackle the UK’s housing crisis. Chancellor Philip Hammond had similar thoughts on financial professionals in the City.

The government will no doubt also be concerned about the potential exodus of around 12,000 EU-trained doctors from the NHS, calculated via a recent British Medical Association survey. On the flipside, the Express seems reassured that Andrea Leadsom wants to replace EU agricultural workers with robots.

All this shows how immigration is a deeply complicated economic and social issue. Leave voters were often motivated by a desire to curb migration. They should be careful what they have wished for.

Want more InFacts?

Click here to get the newsletter

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Choose which newsletters you want to subscribe to (required)
    Daily InFacts NewsletterWeekly InFacts NewsletterBoth the daily and the weekly Newsletter

    By clicking 'Sign up to InFacts' I consent to InFacts's privacy policy and being contacted by InFacts. You can unsubscribe at any time by emailing [email protected]

    This article has been corrected to show the latest migration data is for the 12-month period ending September 2016, not for the calendar year 2016.

    • Tweet
    • Share
    • +1
    • LinkedIn 0
    • Email

    Edited by Hugo Dixon

    4 Responses to “Is EU migration falling faster than even ministers want?”

    • Shouldn’t these Ministers understand the implications of their actions, rather than discover the consequences afterwards? Davis is a self-confessed liar and, by all accounts, not the brightest of individuals.

    • I was against the EU when we first went in. I was against Brexit having come to realise the enormous benefits conferred on ordinary people by the EU (like controlling kindergarten politics in individual countries).
      Now I am all in favour of Brexit (it may have something to do with living in Sweden).

      Simply stated, the EU does not require,desire or need to tolerate member countries who cannot or will not support the concept of mutual cooperation for the benefit of all.
      That I genuinely fear for the consequences upon the ordinary people of the UK may be attributed to old fashioned ‘love of origin country’. But really, are we onlookers abroad supposed to take this Brexit comedy show seriously? Really?

    • Why is IDS mentioned in every single article about Brexit? What is his official role aside from being an MP???? He has none! He’s also told a good number of lies as part of the leave campaign. Leave him out and please quote some other people. Thanks.

    • They should let EU migrants come for the foreseeable future. Otherwise make these jobs attractive for native job seekers with good pay and reasonable working hours. In fact worker rights should remain in tact whether or not we have migrants.