European Court of Justice

Most popular “soft Brexit” option isn’t really a plan, just part of one. Until it’s fleshed out, it’s just another type of blind Brexit.

Newspaper cites unnamed source saying extension means losing rebate and voice at top table. This rides roughshod over EU’s own rules.

EU court is another layer of defence when the most vulnerable in our society face discrimination. After Brexit that will be gone.

To avoid crashing out with no deal and to get a People’s Vote, we’ll need extra time. But there's a right way and a wrong way to do this.

Today’s Opinion of ECJ could not be clearer: the UK can unilaterally, without seeking anyone else’s permission, revoke Article 50.

Both Brexiters appealed to EU law in recent legal battles. This undermines their arguments for leaving.

This week’s European Council summit won’t move Brexit talks forward, thanks to deadlock over Irish border, security and science.

Whether Article 50 can be unilaterally revoked before the Brexit deadline is a question that needs to be decided by the ECJ.

A furtively published “framework” for future security co-operation begs fundamental questions of finance and dispute resolution.

Since PM laid out hard-Brexit red lines at start of 2017 we’ve had one u-turn after another. Here’s our recap of the most significant.

Amidst hoo-ha about May’s transition deal, it’s easy to forget there’s no agreement on how it will be overseen. That could nix whole pact.

May has sensibly retreated from red line that ECJ should have no role post Brexit. That’s price for keeping European Arrest Warrant etc.