Election won’t strengthen UK’s hand with EU

by Hugo Dixon | 19.04.2017

Even if Theresa May wins the general election by a landslide, the EU won’t give us a better deal. This election is more about strengthening the prime minister’s hand in negotiations within her party rather than in negotiations in Europe.

May has, of course, justified her broken promise not to call a snap election on the basis it will allow her to cut a better deal. But what’s the argument or evidence to support that contention?

Sure, she’ll have more kudos when she sits round the negotiating table with other EU leaders as an elected leader with a fat majority. But that won’t change their view about what’s in their interests. Nor will it change their view about the importance of Britain as an economic and strategic partner.

The other leaders’ top priority will still be keeping their club together. That doesn’t mean punishing the UK. But it does mean ensuring that we don’t get such a good deal that other countries are tempted to quit. That, in turn, means that we won’t be able to “cherry-pick” those bits of EU membership that we like while rejecting the bits we don’t like.

Of course, it is in the EU’s economic and strategic interest to do a deal with us. But that isn’t changed one jot by the size of May’s majority. Its red lines will remain the same: the principles of the divorce (including a potentially huge exit payment) must be agreed before talks about a new deal; we must stick to the EU’s rules and keep up budget payments during any transition period between the divorce and agreeing a new arrangement; and there should be no cherry-picking.

The last European leader who came to Brussels demanding a special deal on the basis that he had just secured a domestic mandate was Alexis Tsipras. He was told this was irrelevant and sent packing. After several months of confrontation, the Greek premier called a referendum to back his position, which he won resoundingly. The eurozone didn’t flinch. Within days, he was forced into a humiliating U-turn that involved signing up to a worse deal than the one originally on offer.

Now the UK is not remotely as weak as Greece. But equally May is not as foolish as Tsipras. She seems to recognise that she’ll have to compromise to do a deal. And that appears to be her calculation in calling this election. That is certainly the way the financial markets and European officials are interpreting the move: as a ploy to give her a big enough majority so she doesn’t have to worry too much about the extremists on the right of her party.

Want more InFacts?

Click here to get the newsletter

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Choose which newsletters you want to subscribe to (required)
    Daily InFacts NewsletterWeekly InFacts NewsletterBoth the daily and the weekly Newsletter

    By clicking 'Sign up to InFacts' I consent to InFacts's privacy policy and being contacted by InFacts. You can unsubscribe at any time by emailing [email protected]

    Edited by Luke Lythgoe

    9 Responses to “Election won’t strengthen UK’s hand with EU”

    • From start to finish this whole enormous and unnecessary farce will only ever be about internal Tory Party wrangling.

    • You almost feel sorry for May – or I do.

      With the Europeans refusing to play ball on parallel negotiations for a divorce settlement on one hand, and the new ‘partnership’ trade deal on the other, she was left with very little choice if she were not to become embroiled in messy disputes about a £50b divorce bill just before the next election. With the Opposition parties gunning for her and her right wing europhobes ready to clobber her, what was the woman to do?

      • At the very beginning she should have said the country was split 50-50 so she was going for a soft Brexit, favouring neither the Leave or Remain side. Staying in the single market and customs union, and treating the EU with respect and friendship would have meant that the negotiations would have been easier and beneficial to both the UK and EU.
        However, that would have needed a strong, confident person who was prepared to stand up to the far-right press. Theresa May is not that.

    • ” What could Mrs May, do otherwise, asks Margot? ” What she should have done on becoming PM. That is tell the country I have heard what you propose re leaving the EU and my government will study the matter and see whether it is indeed possible and in the Country’s interest and report back to you.
      It is so obviously not in the country’s interest that there cames a point when reality has to be recognized and that is the job of a wise PM. That is not to say that the UK could not ‘go it alone ‘ as in 1940. Of course it could, but that is not the point. It is clearly in the interests of the UK and Europe that the UK remain in the EU.

      • I’m not sure it can go it alone. It’s in debt, has a terrible deficit, the pound is in problem land. All it needs is the credit agencies to junk UK bonds, and it’s over. Go to the IMF. Pensions and salaries cut ( while the rich Brexiters who lied to the honest poor ones to get them to vote out stash their cash), tax hikes. Not sales of UK products, etc. May just wants to keep her job for a while.