Boris’ Brexit babble battles bureaucracy

by Sam Ashworth-Hayes | 12.03.2016

Mayor of London Boris Johnson shuffled onto a Vote Leave stage in Dartford Kent to deliver what he might himself have once called a foam-flecked hymn of hate delivered “in a state of semi-incoherence”.

He took aim at the EU’s clunking, grinding bureaucratic machinery, which he claimed produces “about 2,500 new regulations” each year, “costing British businesses about £600 million per week”. He’s wrong on both figures.

Far fewer regulations

Between 1990 and 2015, the EU passed 49,806 regulations. The single market in 1992 led to a burst of EU regulatory activity as trade barriers were stripped away. Over the past decade, the EU passed an average 1,500 regulations and directives a year  – about a thousand fewer than the figure claimed by Boris.

The number rises to 2,300 on average annually if EU ‘decisions’ are included. But adding these to the overall cost to Britain is misleading, as decisions often relate to a specific company, person or country, and would not necessarily apply to the UK;  or are administrative – dealing with the EU institutions internal workings.

Costs but also benefits

When Boris said these regulations cost British business £600 million a week he used the figure for the total cost of the 100 most expensive EU rules, not just to businesses, but also the public sector. UK government impact assessments estimate the total cost of these rules at £33.3 billion a year or £640 million a week.

This does not take into account benefits, such as cleaner air. Benefits are estimated at a total of £58.6 billion – a net gain of £487 million a week, according to government data.

Want more InFacts?

Click here to get the newsletter

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Choose which newsletters you want to subscribe to (required)
    Daily InFacts NewsletterWeekly InFacts NewsletterBoth the daily and the weekly Newsletter

    By clicking 'Sign up to InFacts' I consent to InFacts's privacy policy and being contacted by InFacts. You can unsubscribe at any time by emailing [email protected]

    Impact assessments can sometimes overstate benefits – such as £20.8 billion from a global carbon deal that did not materialise. So these are not reliable measures. On the other hand, benefits such as facilitating trade across the single market or protection against workplace discrimination are not quantified.

    But even without these statistical pitfalls, using the 100 most expensive EU regulations to characterise all EU law, as Boris has done, is misleading.

    Boris Johnson did not respond to a request for comment.

    Edited by Yojana Sharma

    3 Responses to “Boris’ Brexit babble battles bureaucracy”

    • This sparring about interpretation of the number of regulations/directives is rather trivial. The parrot mantra about facts is a cover-up of the fact that the Stay adherents have made a lot of suppositions and made promises that are uncertain at best. There are no FACTS about the future, hence no IN-FACTS either! The future has not yet happened, many things change and the pace is increasing in the current turmoil in EU.. There are only predictions of varying degrees of likelihood, and those can be overturned by the will of people who react to them. The Leave campaign have produced masses of facts showing the deficits of being a member and predictions which are based on many well-known precedents of what has happened to UK and other countries under EU misrule.

      • The argument that there are “no facts about the future” is utterly bizarre. Does that mean we can do away with NATO, economic and social policymaking, medical research and space exploration? On the ground that that that is dabbling in “future facts”?